..:: MonsterGarage.it ::.. n.1 in Italia per RC Monster & Truggy

..:: MonsterGarage.it ::.. n.1 in Italia per RC Monster & Truggy (http://www.monstergarage.it/board/index.php)
-   Motori (http://www.monstergarage.it/board/forumdisplay.php?f=33)
-   -   modifica scarico (http://www.monstergarage.it/board/showthread.php?t=2410)

ciccio1972 27-07-2006 18:03

qualcuno ha fatto questa mod?

come va?

http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/4...oheaderun0.jpg

Onryo 27-07-2006 18:20

Così a primo impatto mi sembra una modifica inutile. Secondo me quella svasatura è studiata principalmente per assicurare il collettore al raccordo scarico tramite fascetta, non penso che eliminandola cambi qualcosa in termini di prestazioni. Magari mi sbaglio, ma lascerei perdere comunque :D

ciccio1972 27-07-2006 18:21

recita cosi:

At this point you may be tempted to ‘reflange’ the header’s end – don’t. I’ll explain why below.


After you’ve put the header back on, you’ll want to take care when attaching the exhaust coupling. Make sure you’ve got a nice tight seal and that you’ve slid enough of the coupler over the header. Without the flange, it will be much easier for the coupler to come off. If you haven’t figured it out yet, the purpose of the flange is to give the coupler something to ‘bite’ to.


At this point, you may be wondering how cutting the flange off the header improves performance? There are two theories as to why this is so.


The first theory postulates that by shortening the combustion chamber / tuned pipe distance, you’ve shortened the length of time it takes the pulse wave to reflect back to the combustion chamber. Now the motor gets ‘on the pipe’ at a much lower RPM. This theory makes sense except for the fact that by getting the motor on the pipe at a lower RPM, the motor would loose high RPM power. This is not the case. High RPM power stays the same. Additionally, many people have replaced the stock coupler with a longer one, keeping the length of the exhaust system the same. To me, this last point discredits this theory.


The theory that I feel makes more sense is what I call the “Reverse Venturi Effect” theory. By removing the flange, the exhaust system is now a consistent diameter all the way from the motor to the pipe. If you are familiar with fluid dynamics, you’ll know that gas moving through a pipe will experience an increase in pressure and a decrease in flow rate if the circumference of the pipe increases and just the opposite if the circumference decreases (the venturi effect). I believe the flange causes a reverse venturi effect that messes up both the exhaust flow and pulse wave at low RPMs. Removing the flange eliminates the reverse venturi effect and allows the motor to realize its full potential.

ZeroG 28-07-2006 08:50

se non ho capito male dicono di tagliare quel pezzo per accorciare la marma?! Scusate ma non c'avevo voglia di leggermelo tutto, sono pur sempre le 9.50 del venerdi.... :rolleyes:

Dave Rotella 28-07-2006 09:05

concettualmante come modifica non è sbagliata, io a suo tempo la provai ma poi ho lasciato perdere subito perchè accorciare il collettore ti da un po di coppia in più ai bassi, ma poi il motore non allunga più una mazza :lol:

Val 28-07-2006 11:02

personalmente preferirei cambiare marmitta e non modificare il collettore


Tutti gli orari sono GMT +1. Attualmente sono le 18:58.

Powered by vBulletin versione 3.8.6
Copyright ©: 2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Traduzione italiana Team: vBulletin-italia.it

Copyright MonsterGarage.it